Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.39]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:49:12 -0400 Received: from ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com ([12.73.182.18]) by mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP id <19990625235213.ONYM1417@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:52:13 +0000 Message-ID: <003c01bebf64$a69e9c80$12b6490c@ckrouse_ra.spk.hp.com> Reply-To: "Curtis Krouse" From: "Curtis Krouse" To: Subject: Re: aircraft jacks Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:44:20 -0700 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Bob, Thanks for the info....I'll check them out at the local Home Depot to see what you are talking about. I've got no fear that my jack points will be sufficient. The lay right under the close out rib and are bonded to the load transfer pad...so I'm sure that there is plenty of beef there to hold the plane. Curtis Krouse N753K -----Original Message----- From: Bob Chesley To: Curtis Krouse ; lancair.list@olsusa.com Date: Friday, June 25, 1999 9:37 AM Subject: Re: aircraft jacks >Curtis, > A welder angle iron stand for the bottle jacks has a weight advantage. >However, I have my jacks strapped to the angled cement blocks the Home Depot >sells. They are heavy, but make a very solid platform for the jacks, and are >very inexpensive. > Also... I found that the jack points, as described in the manual, were not >sufficiently reinforced. I use a padded 2 x 4 between the two jacks. The 2 x >4 is just shorter than the distance between the inside gear doors and is placed >just aft of the nose gear door. > >Bob Chesley >L-320 - N4YH >Ojai, CA > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html