Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.164.252] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.5)
  with HTTP id 577883 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:40:42 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] IVP low power settings vs. pressurization
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.5
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:40:42 -0500
Message-ID: <web-577883@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E2E65D6@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
References: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E2E65D6@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "George Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com>:
  
  Colyn,
  
  What  RPM and fuel flow would you be using with the 28:” of MP?
  
  At 28” x 2100 RPM,  I can get the Hp down to as little as 180 or 190 Hp. 
 How
much lower do you want to be???.
  
  Regards,  George

"""
  I've been looking at long range profiles and noticing that a lot of the
interesting range is below
28" MP.  I've heard this is the least that will keep you pressurized at
altitude.
  
  Is this really true?
""""