Return-Path: Received: from imo29.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.73]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:03:57 -0400 Received: from Fredmoreno@aol.com by imo29.mx.aol.com (IMOv20.21) id kQWUa20059 (3983) for ; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:06:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Fredmoreno@aol.com Message-ID: <90a23406.24a324f7@aol.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:06:47 EDT Subject: Preparing for bonding To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I read John Barrett's post on surface preparation for bonding noting his observation that for dental cement, a fine abrasive making more surface area is now preferred, providing better bonding. This supports what I heard at a composite repair course put on by a company that repairs composites for airliners. They also recommend using a fine grade sand paper (240 to 320 as I recall) to provide maximum surface area with minimum damage to underlying fiber. They wipe with solvent (twice_ prior to sanding and vacuum with a clean brush to remove dust. Bonding within 4 hours of sanding is recommended because the just-sanded surface bonds better than one that has been sitting for a while after sanding. (It was described as a "high energy" surface. I leave explanations to the surface scientists.) Grinding away with 40 grit seems intuitively superior, but apparently science, experience and testing have proven otherwise. Fred >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html