In a message dated 12/6/2004 9:21:37 P.M. Central Standard Time,
tthibaultsprint@earthlink.net writes:
The
performance improvement was very small. There was a small increase
in manifold pressure over the updraft without filter. I can make
19.5"
MAP at 12.5K feet. At best, my TAS increased 5 knots.
Quite an expense
and effort for so little of a performance
gain.
Tom,
You got me thinking about whether or not you are finished with the
"experimental" mods, yet. Then I looked at some material Chris Zavatson
had provided - a chart showing a comparison between his old airbox and the
improvements gained from his new ram air charted against altitude derived static
pressure.
I went up to 12,500 and at WOT, 2500 RPM, level flight at 163 IAS (193
TAS), I saw a 20.2" MAP against a 18.66" standard day altitude derived static
pressure. BUT, it wasn't a standard day since the baro
setting was 30.55 and the OAT was -8C (17F) at altitude.
This yielded a palt of 11960 and a dalt of 11550 (about 19.4") - maybe.
Hmmmmm.... How can we compare our ram systems? The
"Aerodynamics of Naval Aviators" pub says you can only make comparisons at the
same density altitude. But, there are a few problems with a few
things. To wit:
1. The method for computing the true static pressure is troublesome since
it is affected by temperature, humidity, the mean temperature at the various
altitudes below you, baro setting, etc. The temperature is also affected
by compressibility since we are going faster than 150 Kts. Of course,
converting this all to "standard day" readings. Note, however, that there
is a rule of thumb that says for every 10 degrees temperature difference from
standard there is a 4% change in altitude. I didn't get the TAT (True Air
Temp), but it was probably a few degrees cooler, say -11C, which would then only
be a difference of -1C from the standard temp for 12,500 MSL.
2. Remember that the pure rise in ram pressure is approximately (in "
HG):
100 KIAS - .5"
150 KIAS - 1.1"
200 KIAS - 2"
After all, that is how our pitot/static airspeed indicator works. So,
at my KIAS of 163, I could only expect a max of 1.2" rise. What is it
exactly? Who knows?
3. The measurement of MAP: Remember that MAP is Manifold Absolute
Pressure - actually, a measurement of vacuum at anything less than WOT.
Everybody's MAP instrument may be a bit different - kinda like body
temperature. With the engine off, my readout is usually about 29.6 at my
airport elevation of 700 MSL (standard day should be about 29.2).
Of course, on the test day I didn't look at that readout on my VM EPI
800 system. My buddy's VM 1000 said 28.6. So, one must also know the
MAP instrument offset.
4. Assuming all things being equal (like don't drain off anymore air), the
pressure was about .6" Hg (about 8" H2O) higher than static in the upper
cowling cooling plenum. Hmmmmm.... Next time I will re-plumb my pitot
driven injector air system and see what it says.
Where does that lead us? See you at the next Air Venture Cup
Race. Now that's the way to compare things.
Consider this:
RAM-Air STC Now Available For Grumman
AA-5 Traveler And AA-5A Cheetah
Alt
Air Without The Filter
Approach
Aviation Development Thursday said it has received FAA STC SA00206BO for an
Alternate Air system for all Grumman AA-5 Traveler and AA-A
Cheetahs.
The new
“RAM-Air” Alternate Air System is designed to provide an alternate source of
induction air to the engine without the restriction of the standard induction
air filter. This system allows the pilot to bypass the induction air filter
in-flight without the reduction in available engine power caused by resorting to
carburetor heat. A cable control in the cockpit opens/closes a valve into the
airbox that supplies unfiltered, high-pressure air from the available air in
front of the forward engine baffling.
The
high-pressure location of the inlet provides a source of "Ram-Air" which has
been tested to increase manifold pressure by approximately 1/2+" Hg. This
equates to 4-5 HP more horsepower at altitudes where normally aspirated aircraft
engines typically produce 75% power or less. The system also increases the
service ceiling and effectively reduces the aircraft’s pressure altitude by
about 750 feet MSL.
"The
“RAM-Air” Alternate Air System is an outstanding and economical performance
addition to the Grumman Traveler and Cheetah." said Jeff Simon, President of
Approach Aviation Development, Inc. "Aircraft induction filters are always a
compromise of engine protection vs. performance. This system preserves the
integrity of the filter on the ground, while allowing the pilot to take
advantage of the increased power naturally available in
flight.”
The “RAM-Air”
Alternate Air System, complete with all necessary hardware, is available at the
introductory price of $750. Installation is very straightforward with a typical
install time of approximately 4-6 hours.
FMI: www.ApproachAviation.com
From Aero-news.net
Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
N92EX IO320 Aurora,
IL (KARR)
Some Assembly Required
Using Common Hand Tools
And the Air We
Breathe.