Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:26:00 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net ([166.102.165.170] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 533872 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:53:36 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.102.165.170; envelope-from=micah@froese.com Received: from DDSV6921 ([151.213.106.129]) by ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net with ESMTP id <20041115235304.FAMV6770.ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net@DDSV6921> for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:53:04 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <002f01c4cb6e$3e31aae0$c801a8c0@DDSV6921> From: "Micah Froese" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Lancair Legacy Sequenced gear doors X-Original-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 18:52:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002A_01C4CB44.3AD4DD60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C4CB44.3AD4DD60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, I am close to finishing the body work on my Legacy and am starting on = the inside. The hydraulics for the gear will be one of the first fun * = projects. Looking back through the LML archives I found 2 different = sequenced gear door systems; http://www.ronk-air.com/ and = http://www.experimentalaircraftsystems.com/legacy_modifications.htm. I = would really like to include this feature and doing it now seems to be = the obvious choice. My question are; is anyone out there flying with = either of these systems? Does either of these have advantages over the = other? Are there any reasons that either of these systems shouldn't be = used in an aircraft. =20 Thanks, Micah Froese Lancair Legacy 2000 28.9241% + - .00002% as of 11/15/2004 14:03 EST * fun being defined as anything not involving sandpaper (-: PS off list replies can go to micah#froese.com ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C4CB44.3AD4DD60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all,

I am close to finishing the body work = on my Legacy=20 and am starting on the inside. The hydraulics for the gear will be = one of=20 the first fun * projects. Looking back through the LML archives I = found 2=20 different sequenced gear door systems; http://www.ronk-air.com/ and = http://www.experimentalaircraftsystems.com/legacy_modifications.htm. =20 I would really like to include this feature and doing it now seems to be = the=20 obvious choice. My question are; is anyone out there flying with = either of=20 these systems? Does either of these have advantages over the = other? =20 Are there any reasons that either of these systems shouldn't be used in = an=20 aircraft.

Thanks,

Micah Froese

Lancair Legacy 2000

28.9241% + - .00002% as of = 11/15/2004=20 14:03 EST

* fun being defined as anything not = involving=20 sandpaper (-:

PS off list replies can go to=20 micah#froese.com

------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C4CB44.3AD4DD60--