Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:48:06 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 533728 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:53:08 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.158.62.67; envelope-from=cfi@instructor.net Received: from wfilter.us4.outblaze.com (wfilter.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id 1C1B2180012C for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:52:38 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.178) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 15 Nov 2004 21:52:38 -0000 Received: by ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0A4D479009C; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:52:38 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) Received: from [63.147.78.27] by ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com with http for cfi@instructor.net; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:52:38 -0700 From: "Ron Galbraith" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Original-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:52:38 -0700 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: VFR for flight testing X-Originating-Ip: 63.147.78.27 X-Originating-Server: ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com X-Original-Message-Id: <20041115215238.0A4D479009C@ws1-14.us4.outblaze.com>
>It always seemed to me that the enroute "controllers" could care l= ess about what equipment one uses to get from point A to point B just as lo= ng as one stays on the airway >or, these days, stays generally on the co= urse line to "B" (NE Blue States'  Iron Fist Air Management notwithsta= nding).  It also seems that a few years back the enroute folks >did= n't have access to waypoints outside their "region" and needed more in= fo, such as Magnetic (12th century device) Heading and distance - givi= ng a position report of 620 >NM ENE of Las Cruces was generally not well= received.  These days it would appear that everyone knows where the f= light is going, even if it is 800 NM that-a-way... 
 
>It is nice to see that the FAA has finally moved forward off of th= e IBM 7090 computers - a computer that I wrote programs for back in 19= 62.
 
If you haven't been to a ARTCC in the past say 8-10 years, then you wo= uld be in for a big shock.  Our equipment is actually state of the art= , unfortuneately we are still using some of that same code that you wrote w= ay back then.   We are scheduled to get all new software to run t= hings within the next 5 years (only about 15 years too late).  As far = as us careing how you get from point A to point B, you are correct, we don'= t care what equipment you have.  Most of the VFR flight following we g= ive are to aircraft with GPS, even if it's a hand held.   Our lat= est system in the ARTCC is called URET (User Request Evaluation Tool), whic= h also replaces the paper flight progress strips, so we now have a 20" lcd = monitor that has all the flight plan info on all airplanes in the sector, a= nd is kept up to date automatically.   One really nice thing abou= t the URET system is that it knows every fix/airport/navaid in the entire U= S, and many out of the US.   It uses the Jeppesen data base, so i= f it's in there, we know where it is.  If you are going from COS to AB= Q via a direct route, and tell me you are 245 miles NE of ABQ, that works f= or me.   The URET system also has a conflict probe, that is alway= s searching ahead for 20 minutes to help the controller detect conflicts ev= en before the airplanes are in the sector.  It is also probi= ng for MOA's restricted areas, and knows your descent or climb profile and = takes that into consideration(knowing the type of aircraft).   Th= is system has reduced the controller workload quite a bit now that we don't= have to constantly write on the flight progress strips anymore.  = ; We also have NEXRAD color radar display right on the scope now too, so we= might actually be able to help you avoid some of those nasty thunderstorms= that we couldn't before.   I know there are a bunch of you out t= here who would be interested in a tour of an ARTCC facility, so if there is= enough interest you could all fly here and have a fly-in/tour.  =   You could bring your favorite sanding block, and we could have a san= ding party too.   I'm in Longmont, Colorado by the way. 
 
Ron Galbraith
LNCE-N5ES 
(hoping elves swarm my hanger over the holiday to surprise me)
 

--=20

___________________________________________________________
Sign-up f= or Ads Free at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/? sr=3Dsignup