Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:58:27 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta-out-1.udlp.com ([207.109.1.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 533413 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:56:43 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.109.1.8; envelope-from=Christopher.Zavatson@udlp.com Received: from asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com (asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com [10.1.62.22]) by mta-out-1.udlp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAFG10u2030789 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:01:00 -0600 Received: from DM-MN-06-MTA by asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:56:03 -0600 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.2 X-Original-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 11:55:41 -0600 From: "Christopher Zavatson" X-Original-To: Subject: [LML] Re: VFR for flight testing Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline <> Ron, Do you know the reasoning behind the tower needing to know whether or not an aircraft is experimental? Several years ago I was talking to some tower controllers at a fly-in and they told me they actually prefer to hear the model of the aircraft. This was so that they have a better feel for the airspeeds involved. (KitFox vs Lancair). I suppose one could say Experimental Lancair N.... . Chris Zavatson