Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:38:20 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-530760@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.158.62.67; envelope-from=cfi@instructor.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Ron Galbraith" <cfi@instructor.net>
Subject: VFR for flight testing

Just because the restrictions for flight testing say "VFR", that doesn't me=
an that you can't be flying on an IFR flight plan, even in class A airspace=
.  It means that you must stay in=20
VFR weather conditions.  You can be in VFR conditions even in class A airsp=
ace.  We had this restriction on every first flight when I was in flight te=
st for a major manufacture'.   I=20
remember this same discussion going on way before this list was going.  Gue=
ss there are new folks at the FISDO's that don't research the past very wel=
l.  Maybe some DAR's are=20
interpreting the "VFR", as non class A airspace.    I know there are a coup=
le of DAR's on this list.  Charlie Kohler, are you required to say "class A=
" airspace in the restrictions?=20=20

Ron Galbraith
LNCE - N5ES`
--=20
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm