Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:40:34 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp.perigee.net ([166.82.201.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.3) with ESMTP id 431453 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:24:06 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.82.201.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net Received: from john-study.home_wireless (dsl-208-26-41-163.perigee.net [208.26.41.163]) by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8P0NY3Y010844 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:23:36 -0400 X-Original-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:23:35 -0400 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] incidence difference References: From: "John Schroeder" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Original-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.52 (Win32, build 3834) > Just a few days ago we all saw the pictures of the fast built Legacy > that lost it's stub wing upper > surface panel, now Mike Easley > writes of an extraordinary 2.7 degrees difference in > wingtip > incidence...what will it be next? > Roberto - Thank you for your interesting analysis and critique. It adds some interesting points to the inquiry of what seems to be a problem, but concluding as you do in the quote above, that the Legacy's loss of the top panel of the stub wing was Lancair's fault is quite unsupported by evidence. I believe that when the investigation is finished, the facts will speak for themselves. Cheers, John Schroeder