Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:32:44 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from esmtp.cave.com ([66.35.72.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.2) with ESMTP id 426755 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:24:19 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.35.72.5; envelope-from=lancair@ustek.com Received: from ustek.com ([66.35.73.227]) by esmtp.cave.com (VisNetic.MailServer.v7.2.4.1) with ESMTP id CQN38002 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:23:37 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <4152DC6E.9010305@ustek.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:23:42 -0400 From: "Robert M. Simon" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: So Has Anybody Fully Stalled These Things? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080403080206090008010406" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080403080206090008010406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MikeEasley@aol.com wrote: > at the tips I have 2.7 degrees difference in incidence. Mike, 1.) Is it possible that the factory fixtures are off that much, or was it more likely a technique problem? 2.) Does Lancair lack a quality control procedure that would have highlighted the problem before you left the builder's assistance program? Or did the shape change over time due to skin stress? Your thoughts? I plan to use at least 2 weeks at the factory, but need some assurance that I would come out with a symmetrical aircraft! Robert M. Simon, ES-P --------------080403080206090008010406 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MikeEasley@aol.com wrote:

at the tips I have 2.7 degrees difference in incidence.

Mike,

1.) Is it possible that the factory fixtures are off that much, or was it more likely a technique problem?

2.) Does Lancair lack a quality control procedure that would have highlighted the problem before you left the builder's assistance program? Or did the shape change over time due to skin stress? Your thoughts?

I plan to use at least 2 weeks at the factory, but need some assurance that I would come out with a symmetrical aircraft!

Robert M. Simon, ES-P

--------------080403080206090008010406--