Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #25095
From: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Redundancy pays
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:05:17 -0400
To: <lml>
Posted for "John Barrett" <2thman@cablespeed.com>:

And that's where the smartness ended-- from redundancy to none at all.
 
 Not sure I agree with Jeff - certainly not with the tone of the response!!
First of all the post seems to have been  intended to share something
 valuable with the group.  It succeeded and should be acknowledged for that.
 Secondly, I suspect the author checked out the situation under the cowl
 before taking off and made a reasoned judgment the spring and its effect on
 the  mixture had a very low likelihood of failure for the duration of the
 ferry flight home.  In the certificated world that's what ferry  permits are
 for.  I give the author, and others who share their experiences, the credit
 for stepping up and sharing.
 
 Every flight carries risk.  My job as pilot is to make those risks
 manageable and assure myself I have done what I can to ensure safety of the
 flight.  I think most of us do that.
 
 Perhaps a description of the spring and its operation with a drawing might
 be cause for intelligent, constructive discussion on the LML, but this wet
 blanket verbal slam against the author's decision to ferry back home is not
 a positive contribution.  There wasn't much smartness from the beginning in
 this response..
 
 Regards,
 John Barrett
 Barrett/Garrett Enterprises, Inc.
 PO Box 428
 Pt. Hadlock, WA 98339
 www.carbinge.com
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster