Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:03:25 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from snoopy.pacific.net.au ([61.8.0.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2925604 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:58:58 -0500 Received: from mongrel.pacific.net.au (mongrel.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.107]) by snoopy.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i09Nwu92030050 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:58:56 +1100 Received: from CRAIN (systime-start.mira.net [203.17.44.160] (may be forged)) by mongrel.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i09Nwsha020170 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:58:54 +1100 From: "Dominic V. Crain" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: Monroy ATD 300 - Yep - ATD 300! X-Original-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:58:52 +1100 X-Original-Message-ID: <001601c3d70c$889b3bc0$0301010a@CRAIN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01C3D768.BC0BB3C0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C3D768.BC0BB3C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Oops.... To clarify, I currently have the less capable Monroy ATD 200 (original version) - and it is still useful. However, I believe the query was about the ATD 300. See the specs @ http://www.monroyaero.com/trafficwatch.html I am ordering one tomorrow! Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Sky2high@aol.com II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL (KARR)" Thanks Scott. I have seen the specs and wondered if any if any of my Yankee comrades had used the ATD300. If so, am looking for advice as to performance and to antenna fitment and location for best results. Then I can justify buying it to she who must be obeyed. Regards DC ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C3D768.BC0BB3C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

 

“Oops....&= nbsp;

To clarify, I currently have the less capable Monroy ATD 200 (original = version) - and it is still useful.  However, I believe the query was about the = ATD 300.  See the specs @

 

I am ordering one tomorrow!

Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
Sky2high@aol.com
II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL= (KARR)”

 

Thanks Scott.

I have seen the specs and wondered if any if any of my Yankee comrades had used = the ATD300.

If so, am looking for advice as to performance and to antenna fitment and = location for best results.

Then I can justify buying it to she who must be = obeyed.

Regards

DC

------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C3D768.BC0BB3C0--