From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Joe Bartel's comment re Aero Supercharger
To: lml
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 09:55:50 -0500
Message-ID: <web-2915388@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <000701c3d1ee$a05a7410$5102a8c0@ccblitzer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "cblitzer" <cblitzer@triad.rr.com>:

I normally sit back and just read what i consider to be mostly just petty
comments, cheap shots as you would as they come across this list. The recent
series of "shots across the bows" that have taken place are little concern
to me since I am building a IV-P  and therefore could quite frankly careless
about anything to do with the Legacy.  However, I have seen comments
regarding some subjects come ever so close to crossing the line between an
open exchange of ideas and what are "foul balls"
If you do not like Joe Bartel's comments as Lancair's President, or if you
just don't like Joe Bartels then just say so.  How on earth does his being a
lawyer have anything to do with this legacy supercharger?
As a lawyer too,  I am offended to read comments that bring disripute to
someone elses idea or thoughts simply because Joe bartel's opinion is
different than others, AND he is  lawyer.  I wonder if your last posting
regarding this matter would have ended with . . . "maybe it is because he is
a plumber . . . if Joe Bartel's was a plumber

Craig Blitzer,
Attorney at Law
Lancair IV-P