Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 19:17:15 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2782494@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <tfsent@worldnet.att.net>
Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with ESMTP id 2782072 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:23:49 -0500
Received: from tomwill (72.honolulu-03rh15rt.hi.dial-access.att.net[12.78.105.72])
          by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP
          id <2003120317233711100jao1ue>; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:23:37 +0000
From: "Tom Williams" <tfsent@worldnet.att.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Vortex Generators
X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:25:14 -1000
X-Original-Message-ID: <MCBBJAEHBCNMIOPFOBBPMEPPCKAA.tfsent@worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-2781879@logan.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000


The function of the generators is to re-attach the flow to the airfoil
at Higher angles of attack than the airfoil alone will support.


It would seem that the generators would ruin the laminar flow at reduced
angles of attack, as in cruise?