Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:42:34 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmail.accesscomm.ca ([204.83.142.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with SMTP id 2731812 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:35:07 -0500 Received: (qmail 20915 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2003 16:35:23 -0000 Received: from cust140-67.weyburn-leg.accesscomm.ca (HELO Jarrett) (216.174.140.67) by qmail.accesscomm.ca with SMTP; 14 Nov 2003 16:35:23 -0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <003201c3aad5$a3c7eb90$8200a8c0@Jarrett> From: "JJ JOHNSON" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] kinetic energy X-Original-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:35:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Gary Casey wrote: Snip.. I don't know what a brake rotor weighs, but I'll guess 5 > pounds. One thing I couldn't find is the specific heat of cast iron, but > most steel alloys have a specific heat of between 0.1 and 0.14, so I'll pick > 0.12. The temperature rise during a braking event is then BTU/(sp.ht.Xlbm), > or about 1,000 degrees F. The brake temperature at the beginning could be > 100, but if you drag the brakes a lot during taxi, heating them up to maybe > 500 and then do a rejected takeoff, you could see 1500 degrees. Gary Question for you. Is this Calculated w/ 2 disks or just one? I couldn't follow all your math[Its way beyond me] but it would seem that the kinetic energy of the a/c is absorbed by two rotors so does this mean that there is infact 1/2 the energy stated? Or did I just miss that fact that you had included that two disks [ Wouldn't be the first time I missed something!]. I'm not building a IV but I'm curiously following this discusion and couldn't help asking. Jarrett 235/32- 55%