Return-Path: Received: from [67.20.112.52] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.6) with HTTP id 2720484 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:12:52 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: L-IV-P nose gear To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.6 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:12:52 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <004001c3a96d$21f54f40$9865fea9@afa.arlingtoninstitute.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "John Petersen" : With all due respect, Bill, I had no idea that there were two sizes of NLG strut. The one I had came with my kit and, and as I explained in an early email to you, we decided to use a V8 engine that required a firewall forward kit that included new cowling, motor mount and NLG strut. My assumption was that there was something special about the engine that required a heavier duty strut and that the one from the original kit worked with any other kit using a Continental engine. It was therefore news to me when Rob Lueck specifically mentioned to you that there were two different sizes of strut and asked you to make sure that what we had was what you wanted. We only shipped the strut to you after we provided pictures and when you had agreed that this was the right size. Having given you every opportunity to decide whether it was what you wanted or not, I can understand Vern?s response to you: "No I won't trade. I don't have any long nose gear forks in stock and haven't had for a number of years. Like I said on the phone, this was a real early strut and there were only a small number made. It wouldn't do me any good at all to have it sitting on my shelf collecting dust." Again, I?d suggest that you see if the original manufacturer could retrofit it with a longer barrel. John L. Petersen The Arlington Institute 1-703-812-7900 x11