Return-Path: Received: from [67.20.112.52] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.6) with HTTP id 2716366 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 13:50:59 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: composite safety To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.6 Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 13:50:59 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <003f01c3a6e3$1abbd410$28a46a3f@dwhome> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "D&BWILLS" : Something that I was investigating a while back is, what happens when you reinforce glass skin with carbon. What I concluded was say for example, if you were to do the anti flutter reinforcement to the LCN2 from the tail forward as has been recomended. And If you use E glass, you would have the same modulus. But if you were to use a carbon lay-up, the stiffness and modulus of the carbon is different. If the carbon fails then you are already above the load of the E glass. Because the carbon is carrying all of the load and the glass has been exceeded. Do any of you have any thoughts on this? Dale Wills 360 Builder