Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:49:55 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [209.210.29.50] (HELO utahweb.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 2703567 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:11:43 -0500 Received: from utahweb.com [208.187.27.39] by utahweb.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.02) id AA9F2B5C0130; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:11:27 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <3FA19A8F.6050702@utahweb.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:11:11 -0700 From: C & A Keller User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mail List Subject: Static Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam. Good comments on the static ports, but how have people been routing the static lines to a tee and on to the panel? Up to the top of the fuselage? Direct forward? Huh? And what sort of moisture trap is used? Would appreciate some thoughts here. Charles --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Utahweb]