Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:50:13 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2637621 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:24:38 -0400 Received: from RPageOne@aol.com by imo-m05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.9c.3695ab8e (4410) for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:24:32 -0400 (EDT) From: RPageOne@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <9c.3695ab8e.2cbea490@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:24:32 EDT Subject: as a graduate of Advanced Pilot Seminars, I actually understand: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1066224272" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 920 -------------------------------1066224272 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit the following post you made. Quite a compliment to you guys from a non-gear head type person! My schedule is starting to get more predicable for weekends. Can't this weekend but is there any interest in meeting? Regards, Richard In a message dated 10/15/2003 12:32:21 AM Central Daylight Time, marv@lancaironline.net writes: Posted for George Braly : Well... let me interject a bit of reality to this. 30" of MAP on an 8.5:1 compression engine is NOT "just loafing along". The ROP, the peak internal cylinder pressures are rather high, unless the fuel flow is up at 33 gph or so. 70F LOP, 30" with 8.5:1 and reasonable timing (22d comes to mind) is very nice in terms of the internal cylinder pressures. Even 31, or 32, or 33" while LOP with 8.5:1 and 22d timing is OK - - but not ROP unless the mixture is VERY VERY ROP. If the engines were 7.5:1 compression ratios, then you can add about 3" to the above, but it is not correct to assert that these engines are just "loafing" along at 30" when they have 8.5:1 compression ratios. At least, if medium to long term durability is an issue. Regards, George Braly >>> 30" of MAP for a Supercharged engine is just loafing along but we will test that parameter also.<<<< -------------------------------1066224272 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

the following post you made. Quite a compliment to you guys from=20= a non-gear head type person!

My schedule is starting to get more predicable for weekends. Can'= t this weekend but is there any interest in meeting? =20= Regards, Richard

In a message dated 10/15/2003 12:32:21 AM Central Daylight Time, marv@l= ancaironline.net writes:

Posted for George Braly <gwbraly@gami.com&g= t;:

Well... let me interject a bit of reality to this.

30"= of MAP on an 8.5:1 compression engine is NOT "just loafing along".&nb= sp;

The ROP, the peak internal cylinder pressures are rather high, u= nless the
fuel flow is up at 33 gph or so.

70F LOP, 30" = ; with 8.5:1 and reasonable timing (22d comes to mind) is very
nice in te= rms of the internal cylinder pressures.

Even 31, or 32, or 33" while=20= LOP with 8.5:1 and 22d timing is OK - - but not
ROP unless the mixture is= VERY VERY ROP.

If the engines were 7.5:1 compression ratios, t= hen you can add about 3" to
the above, but it is not correct to assert th= at these engines are just
"loafing" along at 30" when they have 8.5:1 com= pression ratios. At least,
if medium to long term durability=20= is an issue.

Regards, George Braly

>&g= t;> 30" of MAP for a Supercharged engine is just loafing along but=20= we will
test
that parameter also.<<<<

<= /DIV>

-------------------------------1066224272--