Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 23:01:05 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2570106 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 06 Sep 2003 22:27:26 -0400 Received: from JLINKJR@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.cc.21e1e83a (25305) for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:27:20 -0400 (EDT) From: JLINKJR@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:27:20 EDT Subject: legacy nose gear doors X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_cc.21e1e83a.2c8bf188_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6015 --part1_cc.21e1e83a.2c8bf188_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have an older legacy kit with the original nose gear door close mechanism (not the newer plunger type). I have checked with vern and they are working on an improved version of the newer plunger system. Of those who are flying or close to, would you use the older system or wait for the newer setup? thanks, John Link --part1_cc.21e1e83a.2c8bf188_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have an older legacy kit with the original nose gear= door close mechanism (not the newer plunger type). I have checked with vern= and they are working on an improved version of the newer plunger system. Of= those who are flying or close to, would you use the older system or wait fo= r the newer setup?

thanks,
John Link --part1_cc.21e1e83a.2c8bf188_boundary--