Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:21:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-8.tiscali.it ([195.130.225.154] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9) with ESMTP id 2481022 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:09:03 -0400 Received: from trottolino (62.11.10.47) by mail-8.tiscali.it (6.7.019) id 3F1BCE0E00034B32 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:08:57 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <000f01c34fb3$81d89160$2f0a0b3e@interbusiness.it> From: "Robert Overmars" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Walter Turbine fuel flows/state secret X-Original-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:10:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Saluti tutti, It must be state secret as I'm unable to get from either Lancair or Walter fuel flow data vs shp for the Walter 601. The information I am after is what I'm sure Walter has produced for certification purposes and I'm sure somebody somewhere must have the charts/graphs etc of this information. Essentially it's specific fuel flow vs shaft horsepower at max continuous power, for sea level then for increasing altitudes upto the max permissible for the motor, for ISA, ISA +10 and ISA +20. Then the same except for normal cruise power whatever shp that may be, also for ISA, ISA +10 and ISA +20. Then the same again but for long range cruise, also for ISA, ISA +10 and ISA +20. I have the specific fuel consumption figures for the PT6A-20 for the above and wish to make a comparasion with the Walter to determine what will be the best choice of motor for this LIVPT here in Italy. If anyone can send this information or point me in the right direction I'd be most grateful. Ciao, Roberto d'Italia.