Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:43:34 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2477707@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <kycshann@kyol.net>
Received: from mta02-srv.alltel.net ([166.102.165.144] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9)
  with ESMTP id 2477492 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 23:32:45 -0400
Received: from DF6TS221 ([162.40.148.69]) by mta02-srv.alltel.net
          with ESMTP
          id <20030717033244.FXUL7705.mta02-srv.alltel.net@DF6TS221>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:32:44 -0500
Reply-To: <kycshann@kyol.net>
From: "Shannon Knoepflein" <kycshann@kyol.net>
X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Essential Buss versus Fuel Endurance
X-Original-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 23:34:37 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <001b01c34c14$5c4812b0$6401a8c0@DF6TS221>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-2477472@logan.com>

For those that felt I was off in left field when I said I felt we should
design our electrical systems to outlast our fuel endurance with
alternator out, here is a direct quote from BobN about this very
subject:

    In your OBAM aircraft, what practical limits on system design
    and operation prevent you from having an en route endurance
    of electrical equipment that is equal to or greater than
    fuel endurance?  I will suggest there are none. 

    Bob . . .

Just an interesting tidbit.....

Shannon