Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:44:08 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m08.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.163] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9) with ESMTP id 2474519 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:43:36 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.1da.dd801ce (3850) for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:43:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1da.dd801ce.2c441b78@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:43:04 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair 360 Cowling modifications X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1058193783" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 4021 -------------------------------1058193783 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/14/2003 9:36:50 AM Central Daylight Time, Rob.Logan@Philips.com writes: When I removed the bottom bulge (effectively relocating the air intake) I saw virtually no difference in speed. Matt, Maybe is was the fill and slick paint plus removing the gremlin on the wing that accounted for the increase. Maybe less cooling drag. Maybe........ Grayhawk -------------------------------1058193783 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 7/14/2003 9:36:50 AM Central Daylight Time,=20 Rob.Logan@Philips.com writes:
When I removed the bottom bulge
(effectively=20 relocating the air intake) I saw virtually
no difference in=20 speed.
Matt,
 
Maybe is was the fill and slick paint plus removing the gremlin on the=20 wing that accounted for the increase.  Maybe less cooling drag. =20 Maybe........
 
Grayhawk
-------------------------------1058193783--