Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #19441
From: Richard C Alden <rcalden@juno.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re:Electrical power budjet
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 19:44:20 -0400
To: <lml>
Rob, et al
Here's the electrical load analysis for my 320.  This was published in the LNN in the mid 90's.  The analysis was modelled from the analysis for a Grumman AA5-A Cheetah.
 
CONTINUOUS LOADS
Oil Temp gage                        0.50
Fuel gage                                0.03
Fuel gage                                0.03
Battery relay                           0.60
Strobes (3) Whelen                 7.00
Pitot heat (deactive, 6.5)
Nav lites (3) Whelen                5.60 
Panel  lites                               4.25
Cabin lite                                0.25
Turn/bank (Navaid A/P)         0.30
Autopilot (Navaid)                 1.25
Hobbs hour meter                  0.01
Clock                                    0.00
Graphic Engine Monitor         0.75
Master warning unit                0.08
 
Total continuous                    20.65
 
AVIONICS LOADS
Narco AT150 xpdr                1.60
Narco AR850 encoder           0.35
King KX155 nav/com            0.70
King KI 209 OBS                 0.20
Michel MX11 com                0.90
GPS (Magellan Skynav)        0.30
RST 504 Audio panel            1.00
RST 123 Marker rcvr            0.10
WX-8 Stormscope                0.35
 
Total Avionics loads               5.50
 
Total continouous loads         26.15
 
SHORT TERM LOADS
Fuel pump                              0.65
Flaps                                      8.00
Landing light                           7.50
Landing gear                         29.00
Radio xmit (delta amps)          6.80
 
Total short term loads            51.95
 
Total max load                       78.10
 
Note that the alternator field current does not enter into this. (For what it's worth, I have a 5A CB protecting that circuit - per B&C instructions.)
 
The regs for certificated A/C require that the continuous loads not exceed 80% of the alternator rated output.  Experimentals do not have to meet that, as I understand it, but it seems to be a good standard.
 
I am flyiny with a Nippendenso 35A alternator from Mark Landoll, and have had no problems.  With the gear in transit, I see a healthy discharge on the ampmeter, but not to worry.  When (and if) I activate the probe heat, I'm not going to worry about that either.  Not all the continuous loads are really continuous.
 
Dick Alden
LNC2/320.....N425A
Ft Worth, Spinks (FWS)
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster