Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.84.131] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1b7) with HTTP id 2404622 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 23:35:01 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] TSIO 550 Rich or Lean of Peak? To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1b7 Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 23:35:01 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <52548863F8A5D411B530005004759A933920A9@QBERT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for George Braly : Dan, When I teach IA certificate renewal classes, I do a little quiz. It turns out that about 95 out of every 100 mechanics in the room believe that a "lean mixture" is one that is about 25F ROP. None of them have any experience with operations that are ACTUALLY lean of peak - - as opposed to just "not rich enough". One mechanic recently made a comment on the AVSIG forum on CompuServe that all of the engines run "too lean" burned up... One of his customers pointed out that he had just disassembled his 1800 hour TIO-540 Lycoming and had commented that that was an exceptional clean engine. That engine had been operated from the 1000 hour point out to 1800 hours all lean of peak. For the first 1000 hours of its life, it was run ROP and all six jugs were changed, some more than once. From 1000 to 1800 no jugs were changed. The mechanic in question was intellectually honest about the matter and confessed that in his 20 something years - - that was the FIRST AND ONLY ENGINE he had ever had in his shop that he ACTUALLY knew had been run LOP, as opposed to having been run "... not rich enough." This is VERY typical of engine people and engine shops. Regards, George