Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 21:59:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [32.97.166.31] (HELO prserv.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b6) with ESMTP id 2369975 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 31 May 2003 17:36:14 -0400 Received: from b8p5r1 (slip-12-66-14-215.mis.prserv.net[12.66.14.215]) by prserv.net (out1) with SMTP id <20030531213711201062vakve>; Sat, 31 May 2003 21:37:12 +0000 From: "Larry Henney" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Tool time! X-Original-Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 16:38:01 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <000001c327bc$ea724c80$d70e420c@b8p5r1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Jim, I had some rough per sq in idea when I built my 360. Am trying to be a little more precise now on an ES. Are you saying .25 g/ sq in. is basically a per BID layer rule of thumb. Thus, .50 for 2 BID and 1.00 for 4 BID, etc. ? I preferred to think in terms of epoxy pump strokes. So many sq in at a certain BID was so many strokes. Or, I guess more precisely, how does your per gram plan equate volumetrically? Thanks, Larry Henney