Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 02:23:44 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r06.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.102] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b6) with ESMTP id 2360116 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 May 2003 00:05:51 -0400 Received: from Billhogarty@aol.com by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36.3.) id q.1d9.a156389 (4446) for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 00:05:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Billhogarty@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1d9.a156389.2bfef81b@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 00:05:47 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] lightning X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1d9.a156389.2bfef81b_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10625 --part1_1d9.a156389.2bfef81b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit For Ted Noel: Ted: Did you happen to notice if the prototype had the wing conductively connected (wired) to the fuselege? Interesting that the lighting exit point was in the wing root (isnt that e-glass). Do you remember if the plane had static wicks? Interesting topic. thanks, Bill Hogarty --part1_1d9.a156389.2bfef81b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For Ted Noel:

Ted:  Did you happen to notice if the prototype had the wing conductive= ly connected (wired) to the fuselege?  Interesting that the lighting ex= it point was in the  wing root (isnt that e-glass).  Do you rememb= er if the plane had static wicks?

Interesting topic.  thanks, Bill Hogarty



 --part1_1d9.a156389.2bfef81b_boundary--