Return-Path: Received: from [65.173.216.72] (HELO mtasmtp2-clev.cle.ms.philips.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b2) with ESMTP id 2091205 for lml@lancair.net; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:07:01 -0500 Received: from picker.com ([149.59.192.105]) by mtasmtp2-clev.cle.ms.philips.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP id 2003032815072276:65294 ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:07:22 -0500 Received: from [144.54.52.3] (HELO philips.com) by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1) with ESMTP id 16405176 for lml@lancair.net; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:06:56 -0500 Sender: rob Message-ID: <3E84AB5D.316033E5@philips.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:06:53 -0500 From: Rob Logan Reply-To: Rob@Logan.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en, pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lml@lancair.net Subject: Removable Legacy Window [answers] References: <008901c2f565$92ab5840$6601a8c0@cruzio.com> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mtasmtp2-clev/P/SERVER/PHILIPS-CLE(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 03/28/2003 03:07:22 PM, Serialize by Router on mtasmtp2-clev/P/SERVER/PHILIPS-CLE(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 03/28/2003 03:07:26 PM, Serialize complete at 03/28/2003 03:07:26 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Dave Saylor" > Have you flown with it yet? How fast? In rain? Dave Morss says he's flown at the published cruise speeds with no problems, but I haven't had a chance to fly in it yet. No rain yet either. I'll keep you posted. > My concern it how it looks inside... It should blend into the interior pretty well. Except for the stiffener, which isn't too obtrusive, it looks a lot like a bonded window. You could dress up the attach hardware any number of ways. I'll take an interior picture at Sun N Fun, so you should have an image next week. > you will offer it for both the left side and right side windows? I'm planning on offering left and right windows. > assure structural integrety of the fuselage Without going into great detail, I have verified that all the engineering done on the plane neglected any effects of the windows being installed. So effectively flying without any strength added by the window should not be any problem. Dave --