Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 23:11:57 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r07.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.103] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b1) with ESMTP id 2084240 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:30:36 -0500 Received: from RicArgente@cs.com by imo-r07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id q.16c.1c250d73 (3972) for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:30:29 -0500 (EST) From: RicArgente@cs.com X-Original-Message-ID: <16c.1c250d73.2bafc7c5@cs.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:30:29 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Rocketeer X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_16c.1c250d73.2bafc7c5_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 8000 --part1_16c.1c250d73.2bafc7c5_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/23/2003 7:51:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, RWolf99@aol.com writes: > "Grease" suggested "Rocketman" rather than Rocketeer. So I think I'll stick > > with that. The old rule that I just made up regarding handles: Once flying, you are stuck, still building, you get more leeway... Rocketman/Rocketeer both sounds good to me! -grease --part1_16c.1c250d73.2bafc7c5_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 3/23/2003 7:51:18 PM Eastern Standa= rd Time, RWolf99@aol.com writes:
"Grease" suggested "Rocketman"=20= rather than Rocketeer.  So I think I'll stick
with that.


The old rule that I just made up regarding handles: Once flying, you are stu= ck, still building, you get more leeway...

Rocketman/Rocketeer both sounds good to me!

-grease --part1_16c.1c250d73.2bafc7c5_boundary--