Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 08:12:19 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r04.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.100] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b1) with ESMTP id 2083008 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:28:41 -0500 Received: from RicArgente@cs.com by imo-r04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.21.) id q.10c.215127bd (4340) for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:28:32 -0500 (EST) From: RicArgente@cs.com X-Original-Message-ID: <10c.215127bd.2badb0f0@cs.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:28:32 EST Subject: Re: [LML] LNC2 in an ILS X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_10c.215127bd.2badb0f0_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 8000 --part1_10c.215127bd.2badb0f0_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I couldn't understand why I was getting so much slack regarding my initial statement on when I drop the gear during an ILS approach, which I thought was a widely accepted procedure for retract aircraft. Bill 'Stuka' pointed it out to me last night... Original Statement: "- At one dot above the glide slope, gear comes down @ approx 120 knots IAS. " I should have mentioned that the gear comes down when the freak'n BAR is one dot above the glide slope. Hope this clarifies my approach procedure. Sorry for the confusion. Rick Argente --part1_10c.215127bd.2badb0f0_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I couldn't understand why I was getting so much slack=20= regarding my initial statement on when I drop the gear during an ILS approac= h, which I thought was a widely accepted procedure for retract aircraft.

Bill 'Stuka' pointed it out to me last night...

Original Statement:
"- At on= e dot above the glide slope, gear comes down @ approx 120 knots IAS. "

I should have mentioned that the gear comes down when the freak'n
BAR is one dot above the glid= e slope.


Hope this clarifies my approach procedure.

Sorry for the confusion.

Rick Argente
--part1_10c.215127bd.2badb0f0_boundary--