Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:24:42 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nycsmtp2out.rdc-nyc.rr.com ([24.29.99.223] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 2051434 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:08:54 -0500 Received: from computer (66-108-117-233.nyc.rr.com [66.108.117.233]) by nycsmtp2out.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.12.1/Road Runner SMTP Server 1.0) with SMTP id h2DF2PgE029836 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:02:45 -0500 (EST) From: "Jack Cowell" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: paint X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:03:50 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Hello All, In response to questions as to the difference between "aircraft" and "automotive" exterior paint for a IVP, I have received differng opinions as to the benefits of "aircraft" paint. I know that the aircraft variety is much more expensive, but have not been able to quantify the benefits that go along with this extra cost. Also, are there significant negatives associated with applying "aircraft" paint vs. the "automotive" variety? Are there particular brands -- in either paint category -- that are superior? What do you experts recommend to this paint neophyte? Thanks for your help, Jack Cowell