Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:18:06 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp.comcast.net ([24.153.64.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 2039839 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:13:31 -0500 Received: from cp172883-b.arlngt01.va.comcast.net (pcp735631pcs.arlngt01.va.comcast.net [68.50.58.204]) by mtaout04.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.09 (built Jan 7 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HB100E4I12I7K@mtaout04.icomcast.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:13:30 -0500 (EST) X-Original-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:14:13 -0500 From: Bob Pastusek Subject: RE: [LML] proper toque values/calibration In-reply-to: X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Reply-to: rpastusek@htii.com X-Original-Message-id: <001201c2df44$6f071320$6601a8c0@cp172883-b.arlngt01.va.comcast.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal ...Anyway, one of the things suggested by my buddy was to calibrate the torque wrenches. There are companies that do that but I was wondering if any one out there has done it, what it costs and if anyone thinks it's worth it? Dan Newland ES #61 Dan, Over the years I've had occasion to check my personal torque wrenches (Sears and SnapOn brands) at Air Force test facilities (PMEL if you know the lingo) and found that they were always within a few percent (less than 5% error) of the set value. I'd say that if you have good tools and take care of them as precision instruments, formal calibration is probably overkill for the kind of work you're doing on building an ES. If you're working inside the engine, I'd be a bit more careful about these things. There's a simple test you can use to gain some confidence in your wrench: Borrow a good quality torque wrench that's new or in good condition and use a socket to "join" them together. Test one tool against the other. This is no guarantee of accuracy--they could both be off--but if the results are close and consistent across the torque range of the tools, I'd say you have pretty good confidence that yours is OK. I've never used a commercial service, but if they operate like the AF facilities, you'll get a print out of the measured versus actual torque values across the range of the tool. A nice record and confidence builder as well. No matter what, be sure to use a tool of the proper range. The typical torque wrenches used in automotive work are almost useless when working the AN3 to AN5 bolts we use extensively in aircraft construction. Bob Pastusek