Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.173.216.66] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0.6)
  with HTTP id 2022014 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:11:13 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Treating Control Tubes
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0.6
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:11:13 -0500
Message-ID: <web-2022014@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <000a01c2d2c9$4c5518e0$3e4ffea9@centurytel.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Robert Smiley" <rsmiley@centurytel.net>:

I did it. It has worked historically.  Is it overkill?  Does it matter? Only
you can decide.  I for one built this airplane for two reasons. First to
learn by doing and building a flying machine and second. To fly.  It
certainly cannot hurt and it may improve your machine.  This is one of those
"attention to details" that make your plane a better machine.

I have one question. Anodizing does provide protection vs bare aluminum.
But one must be concerned about corrosion, especially that corrosion you
cannot see from the inside of a tube.

Bob Smiley
N94RJ