Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:05:39 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2009402@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <VTAILJEFF@aol.com>
Received: from imo-m07.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.162] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5)
  with ESMTP id 2008925 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 12:04:36 -0500
Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com
	by imo-m07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.178.1637e3e4 (30960)
	 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:04:26 -0500 (EST)
From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com
X-Original-Message-ID: <178.1637e3e4.2b714c9a@aol.com>
X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:04:26 EST
Subject: Re: [LML] new aircraft-new engine break-in
X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113

I just completed my 40 hour test period in my Lancair IVP. Yes, breaking in a 
new engiene versus test flying a new plane are at odds with each other (go 
slow/ go fast). However the flight envelope on the LIVP is well understood. 
It is more like production test flying than experimental test flying. I broke 
in the engine first. No problems-- for good advice talk to Charlie Kohler. 

Jeff Edwards
LIVP N619SJ