Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 09:55:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r07.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.103] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 2008579 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 02:29:08 -0500 Received: from Newlan2dl@aol.com by imo-r07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.c1.2e1f1dd9 (4592) for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:29:01 -0500 (EST) From: Newlan2dl@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:29:01 EST Subject: new aircraft-new engine break-in X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10637 Hi folks I've been reading about breaking in a new or rebuilt engine and also about testing your new plane. The obvious conclusion is that they are really at odds. With a new plane, you want to gradually work up to full speed before you explore the top end of the envelope. The reverse is true of a new engine in that it needs to be run at high power settings to seat the rings and properly break in the cylinders. So what do you engine guru's have to say? I've never done either break in, i.e. new plane or engine. 1. Has there been a significant number of engine problems related to being poorly broken in while expanding the flight envelope? 2. One person suggested buying a used engine that was already broken in. Any idea what that costs and the chances of getting a lemon? 3. And some very knowledgable people participated in a discussion a couple of weeks ago about aircraft diesels. How are they broken in? Thanks for the help guys! Dan