Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #17475
From: Jim Cameron <toucan@78055.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Dan Newland re c.g. of the ES
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:45:50 -0500
To: <lml>
    The ES tends to be nose-heavy with the IO-550.  I imagine the reason is that it was originally designed for either the IO-550 or the IO-360.  The nose-heaviness was something of a problem on my first ES, on which I used the metal Hartzell 3-blade prop.  On my current ES I have the 4-blade MT prop, which is 22 pounds lighter.  The c.g. came out about an inch farther back, and the handling, particularly on final and touchdown, is much better than the first plane.
 
    If you went with a heavier engine, you'd definitely need to balance up in the tail; otherwise, the c.g. would probably be forward of the allowed envelope.
 
    As for cooling, the cowl inlets are probably plenty big enough.  If someone is having overheating problems, they are probably either having leakage around their baffling, or have not opened up and flanged the exhaust outlets at the bottom rear of the cowl.
 
Jim Cameron
N143ES
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster