Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:33:25 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2002943@logan.com>
From: Newlan2dl@aol.com
Subject: Re: [LML] diesels
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks for the info Gary but if I understand you correctly, you are implying 
that the diesel doesn't need as much cooling.  So why does the SMA air cooled 
diesel have double the intake area compared to the standard C182?

And another note is that it was designed to get rated HPat 2200 RPM which 
increases the potential efficiency of the prop when compared to the standard 
2500-2700 RPM.  I say potential because they have yet to tweek the prop and 
are instead using a standard issue model so that is not at its full 
potential.

And last, are the Lancair IV and ES's prone to being nose heavy or tail 
heavy? Even if the extra output and fuel consumption are attractive, 
ballasting the tail could wipe out those differences.

Dan Newland
Super ES