Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 18:29:02 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com ([204.127.198.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3) with ESMTP id 1943109 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 10:43:30 -0500 Received: from attbi.com (h0050e4f9850f.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.42.21]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53) with SMTP id <2003010115432805300i2i12e>; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:43:29 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <3E1307D5.68E6E8EB@attbi.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 10:23:00 -0500 From: "Angier M. Ames" Reply-To: N2811A@attbi.com Organization: Alpha Delta Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-CC: Mark Mahnke Subject: Re: LNC2 Hyd. Power Pack References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I spoke with Mark at Lancair a month or so ago concerning the issue of spool valves being installed backwards at Oildyne. I have not yet tested my gear but plan to do so before spring. I suggested that the expense of reversing the valve, if required, ought to be borne by either Lancair or Oildyne but not by the builder. Mark, I don't know if this is an isolated problem or not, but it would be helpful if you would post to LML the official Lancair position on this issue. With regard to the spool valve, if it is installed in reverse, is this immediately obvious in terms of gear operation? Happy New Year to you all, Angier Ames