Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:02:05 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-r05.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 1911664 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 19:43:01 -0500 Received: from Billhogarty@aol.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.15.4ab51dd (17228) for ; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 19:42:58 -0500 (EST) From: Billhogarty@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <15.4ab51dd.2b2d2a12@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 19:42:58 EST Subject: Windshield Goo X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_15.4ab51dd.2b2d2a12_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10674 --part1_15.4ab51dd.2b2d2a12_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rumor has it that masking tape goo on the windows can be removed with a small amount of 100LL. Another rumor says that WD40 will do the trick. Can anyone verify or disprove? Thanks, Bill Hogarty --part1_15.4ab51dd.2b2d2a12_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Rumor has it that masking tape goo on the windows can be removed with a small amount of 100LL. Another rumor says that WD40 will do the trick. Can anyone verify or disprove? Thanks, Bill Hogarty --part1_15.4ab51dd.2b2d2a12_boundary--