Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 08:08:27 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [32.97.166.34] (HELO prserv.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 1900228 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:19:54 -0500 Received: from oemcomputer (slip-12-64-216-109.mis.prserv.net[12.64.216.109]) by prserv.net (out4) with SMTP id <2002121204194120404q6apse>; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 04:19:48 +0000 From: "Larry Henney" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] LNC2 oleos X-Original-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:19:51 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <000101c2a195$c0d6d920$6dd8400c@oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: Michael, I am planning to buy Sprys. His are differentiated by their failure mode. That is, with the external spring they'll still have a little function if the oleo goes flat (and vice versa). I've heard of two situations that Ong's have failed. I know of no major adverse affect but find comfort in having at least half a strut for landing. Cheaper too. Larry >Not a bad word about either. >It looks like there is not much in it between the two.