Return-Path: Received: from www02.netaddress.usa.net ([204.68.24.22]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 03:29:30 -0500 Received: (qmail 15327 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Jan 1999 08:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <19990124083100.15326.qmail@www02.netaddress.usa.net> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 08:31:00 From: Dan Schaefer To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Pitch, uh, "responsiveness" X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To you guys (and Gals, I keep forgetting) who are commenting an the pitch response of their Lancairs. A couple of years back, the factory came out with a letter recommending that we all reduce the length of the elevator control horn (that is, the point where the push rod is connected) by an inch, if memory serves. What I gained from this is a bit less stick movement during the slow- speed landing regime, but the airplane seems just as "responsive" in pitch, for gross stick movements, as ever. But hey! I've gotten used to it and I like it just fine and most probably will too, given some time. Of course you have to fly using just pressure on the stick but what else is new? The only time it bothered me any was when I started a smartly executed right turn and found myself counting rivets on a Bonanza cowl. The jerk had actually snuck up on me to formation station as I was slowing down to get into the pattern. Needless to say, it startled me to the point that I jerked the stick and bashed my head on the canopy - Hard! But for all other regular flying, such responsiveness is what I wanted in an airplane and got in a Lancair. Puts the FUN back in flying, as far as I'm concerned. Referring to the handling as crummy (or whatever the phrase was) means maybe you you're not getting the fun out of this airplane that it can provide. Too bad! Dan Schaefer N235SP