Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:06:42 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from traven.uol.com.br ([200.221.4.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1886516 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:12:45 -0500 Received: from laptop ([200.245.8.154]) by traven.uol.com.br (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA19999 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:58:50 -0200 (BRST) X-Original-Message-ID: <014e01c29495$23ef04a0$03030381@laptop> From: "Silvio Novelli" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: com antenna X-Original-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:16:42 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0069_01C2947C.83979480" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0069_01C2947C.83979480 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does anyone has any opinion on using the horizontal stab (carbon fiber) = as groundplane for com antenna? Silvio Novelli L320 70% Brazil ------=_NextPart_000_0069_01C2947C.83979480 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Does anyone has = any opinion=20 on using the horizontal stab (carbon fiber) as groundplane for com=20 antenna?
 
Silvio Novelli = L320 70%=20 Brazil
------=_NextPart_000_0069_01C2947C.83979480--