Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:02:35 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m08.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.163] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1884520 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:35:06 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.a3.32e8a82b (1320) for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:34:46 -0500 (EST) From: RWolf99@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:34:46 EST Subject: Closing the Horizontal Tail X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 108 This may be relevant to all Lancairs, as it relates to measuring a fast-build tail to determine whether there is a twist which needs to be removed during closing. I was all set to Bondo the HTail (at least the stabilizer) to my assembly jig when I noticed that there are significant unsupported sections. In other words, the 3/4 inch particle board that I band-sawed to match the airfoil contour don't line up perfectly, and that one can deform the tail to fit the "template" by applying weight to the top. Which is correct, the tail or the template? In other words, is the tail still untwisted after 8 years of storage, or is my cheap, crappy jig ... err ... cheap and crappy? The jig is not really that bad -- I used 3/4 inch thick birch plywood (the really good stuff) and have two layers of that sandwiching several milled 2x2's. Not just rough sawn 2x2's but milled. It's really good stuff. The resulting base is flat, straight and stiff. (Not to mention expensive.) Attached to this base are particle boards standing on end, bandsawed to a template provided by Lancair. There are five such "ribs", one in the center, one on each end, and one midspan each side. Recall that the tail is carbon fiber with the spars and ribs installed on one side. The other side (face?) is more flexible, but with honeycomb-cored graphite it's still pretty stiff. Therefore I had reason to believe that the tail was untwisted, unlike many of the other large, floppy fiberglass parts that inevitably change shape a little if stored unconnected for a long time. So I got airfoil contours from Abbott and Von Dohnhoff for the NACA 0012 airfoil, which is what the Mark II tail is. I found a pair of points that were the same height-above-centerline (y/c for you aero types), one on each side of the "crest" of the airfoil. I then drew marks on the tail at the center and at midspan for the corresponding x/c locations. What we have now is a pair of dots (at each rib location) that should be at the same height above the centerline. The dots are closer to each other on the shorter ribs, but their percentage-of-chord-back-from-the-leading-edge are the same. Why do this? The problem is, the airfoil is humped (as we know, that's how they work) so my digital level won't sit flat anywhere. So I took two pieces of hinge pin rod (piano wire) and set those up spanwise at the two dots, and laid my digital level on the two piano wires. Note that the readings were not zero since the table on which I put the jig is not level -- that doesn't matter. What's important is that I get the same readings for all rib locations. In my case, the readings were identical between the centerline measurement and the midspan measurement. (All were 0.7 degrees nose down, so my workbench isn't all that bad either) I could not take a reading at the tip since the elevator counterbalance arm is too far forward, but if I wanted to I could take another measurement about 5 inches in from the tip. The resolution on my digital level is 0.1 degrees. So in conclusion, my tail is not twisted. I can goop up the jig ribs with Bondo and gently lay the tail onto the Bondo rather than have to "prewarp" the tail when attaching it to the jig (as I had to do with the wings to get the tiny amount of twist out). The Bondo will smooth out the irregularities in the jig ribs so that the tail does not warp when closeout weights are applied. According to Mark at Lancair, I also need metal angles to keep the tail from sagging between the jig ribs. He told me that I could use them either above the tail (put the weight on the angles) or below (cut notches in the jig ribs for the angles and lay the tail on the angles). I have elected to lay the weights on the angles, except for the elevator trailing edges, where I have an angle underneath and one on top so I can use "cleco clamps" (side grip fasteners) to clamp the trailing edge between two angles to prevent waviness. That's my Thanksgiving weekend project. The tail will be closed before the turkey leftovers are gone! - Rob Wolf LNC2 50% IO-360