Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 01:11:55 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vineyard.net ([204.17.195.90] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.1) with ESMTP id 1872222 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:59:09 -0500 Received: from direct (FSY24.VINEYARD.NET [66.101.65.24]) by vineyard.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 891F491BFA for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:59:01 -0500 (EST) X-Original-Message-ID: <004201c28d0b$b3174ac0$0d416542@direct> From: "Ted Stanley" X-Original-To: "Mail List Lancair" Subject: Props - low vs. high pitch and oil pressure X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:57:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 There has been quite a bit of discussion regarding propellers and what drives them from one blade angle to another. The link and text below are from Hartzell. There is another link to McCauley at the very end of this post which has good info and nice diagrams. This information may help to eliminate some confusion. In the event of a powerplant failure it would be beneficial to know how YOUR propeller/governor works. Obviously not all engine failures result in loss of oil pressure, but knowing what will happen in a given failure mode could make a world of difference. Ted Stanley - A&P-IA http://www.hartzellprop.com/engineering/sitelink_faqs_hp.htm What is the difference between an oil-to-decrease-pitch and an oil-to-increase-pitch propeller? Are they interchangeable on a given installation? It is not advisable to interchange propeller types on a given installation. The following explanations show why each propeller type is selected for a particular aircraft. For most general aviation propellers, an oil-to-increase pitch propeller is the simplest, lightest and most affordable form of controllable propeller. When the prop is rotating, centrifugal force acts not only to pull the blade firmly against the hub, but also to twist the blade toward low pitch. Therefore control force only needs to be supplied in one direction - to increase pitch. The absence or reduction of this control force naturally results in a reduced pitch. The governor continually monitors the engine speed. When it senses that the RPM is higher than the setting selected by the pilot, it supplies oil to a hydraulic cylinder on the front of the propeller. The high-pressure oil pushes on a piston, which causes the blades to increase in pitch until the RPM returns to its preset value. When the governor senses an underspeed, it allows oil to drain from the cylinder, decreasing blade angle, until the RPM increases the desired amount. A spring inside the propeller ensures that the blades return to low pitch when the RPM is too low to generate sufficient centrifugal force. This type of propeller is used on most single engine airplanes. Conventional twin-engine airplanes need propellers having the ability to feather (where the blades are aligned parallel with the direction of flight) when there is a loss of power or a loss of oil pressure. The oil-to-increase pitch propeller would present a safety hazard to a conventional twin airplane because it defaults to a low pitch position in the absence of power or oil pressure. If power is lost on only one engine, its propeller will windmill creating negative thrust, which when combined with the positive thrust from the remaining engine, makes the airplane difficult or even impossible to control. A feathered propeller has very little drag, so there is less asymmetric thrust with one propeller feathered than with one propeller windmilling and the aircraft is more controllable. For a propeller to default to feather instead of low pitch requires that both the propeller and the governor be significantly different from that of the oil-to-increase pitch propeller. Each blade is generally fitted with a counterweight, which is sized and positioned such that centrifugal force on the counterweight assembly causes a twisting action toward high pitch. A large spring is also used to force the blades into the feathered position as RPM diminishes and the counterweight becomes ineffective. Control oil must now be supplied to decrease pitch, opposing the forces of the counterweights and the feathering spring. The governor for such a propeller operates in the opposite sense from that described previously, supplying oil only if it senses an underspeed. Acrobatic airplanes also benefit from using oil-to-decrease pitch propellers. These propellers are nearly identical to feathering propellers except that their high pitch angles are limited to values similar to those used in oil-to-increase pitch props. Due to the attitudes in which acrobatic airplanes operate oil pressure fluctuations sometimes occur. These fluctuations not only affect engine lubrication, but also change the speed of the propeller. If acrobatic aircraft were to use oil-to-increase pitch propellers, this could result in a momentary overspeed at the same time the engine is starved for lubricating oil. Using an oil-to-decrease pitch propeller results in an underspeed in this situation, which helps to protect both the propeller and the engine. ALSO GO TO http://www.mccauley.textron.com/pro-sup/prosupframeset.html for a similar discussion from McCauley