Return-Path: Received: from imo28.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.72]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 05:29:48 -0500 Received: from N295VV@aol.com by imo28.mx.aol.com (IMOv18.1) id CIHNa23173 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 05:30:22 -0500 (EST) From: N295VV@aol.com Message-ID: <251e744c.369f18be@aol.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 05:30:22 EST To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Re: Flutter Modification X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> From: n295vv@aol.com If Martin H. recommends 3 layers on the outside, put 3 layers on the outside, or if impractical, 3 or 4 layers on the inside. But 13 layers in a narrow width on the inside--no way! Such a stiff, unflexing narrow flat post structure embedded linearly in the interior of the tailcone is going to drastically change the way loads are absorbed and redistributed. Stiffen one side of a cone, and you transfer energy to some focus on the other side somewhere, or maybe even to some site far away where it may cause catastrophic failure. One of the reasons our planes stay in the sky is that parts have some degree of flexibility. This flexibility allows sudden loads to bend parts and spread loads over larger areas rather than concentrating the load in a small area which may result in failure. Stiffness is a virtue up to some point--beyond that point it is a liability. I have enormous respect for Martin. I have flown my plane at amazing speeds at a distance of several times the circumference of the earth. Amazingly, nothing has fallen apart. Thanks, Martin. And thanks, Lance. David Jones, Pecatonica, Illinois