Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 15:17:17 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from jsc-ems-vws03.jsc.nasa.gov ([139.169.39.50] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0) with SMTP id 1853534 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 15:03:04 -0500 Received: from 139.169.16.60 by jsc-ems-vws03.jsc.nasa.gov (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 05 Nov 2002 13:06:39 -0600 Received: by jsc-smtp02.jsc.nasa.gov with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:06:39 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <1848CABD3587A84DAC6B3F82FE01D9FC01F1FC00@jsc-mail08.jsc.nasa.gov> From: "THORN, VALIN B. (JSC-OM) (NASA)" X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Legacy Horiz Stab Angle Of Incidence X-Original-Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:06:31 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain The Legacy construction manual calls for -0.3 to -0.6 degrees angle of incidence for the horizontal stabilizer. Since there are a number of Legacy's flying now, I thought I'd ask what has been used and how well it has worked out. What I mean by how well has it worked out is, for example, if you're flying a Legacy with an IO-550, with the c. g. in the middle of the c. g. envelope, does your elevator ride perfectly in trail of the stabilizer? If not about how much is it off and in which direction? The optimal angle of incidence is going to be a function of engine selection and I'd expect the more negative end of the range is best for the IO-550 vs. the lighter IO-360 engine option... Thanks, Valin Thorn Legacy 173