Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:04:35 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp-server3.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b9) with ESMTP id 1806607 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:17:43 -0400 Received: from charlie (58.63.26.24.cfl.rr.com [24.26.63.58]) by smtp-server3.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id g9GCHg7Z026457 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:17:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <001f01c2750d$9ca0be40$3a3f1a18@cfl.rr.com> From: "Charles Kohler" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Tale of Two IV's - Leading Edge Pitting X-Original-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:14:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Static wick are likely to be cosmetic only. Much work and testing is required to make them operational. THE test; Take a 100W landing light and connect the positive to the battery positive with a long extension cord. Next, connect a short jumper from the light negative terminal to a screw inserted in static wick receptacle. If light is bright= good static wick that will do the job and reduce pitting on LE. I'll wager the subject airplane with pitting and static wicks have more than a few in the cosmetic category. Charlie K.