Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:36:21 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1750984 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:10:54 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay2.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id H2XA5O08.O1Y for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:10:38 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: elevator balancing X-Original-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:08:39 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> I am certainly not the expert, but have a couple of observations: First, the elevators aren't uniformly balanced anyway as the weights are at the ends. Not being balanced end-to-end, though, could be a little troubling. The best way may be to take some weight out of the "overbalanced" one and then use the center weight to bring it up to balance, creating three weights that distribute the balance. Second, consider two production airplanes - my Cardinal has no balance weights except for the big one in the center. Next, the Comanche was originally built with a single weight in the center, but to increase the red-line speed someone came up with weights to put at the tips. This implies that it would be a good thing to distribute the weight along the span. Gary Casey certainly not even an amateur aerodynamicist