Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 01:51:36 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1741168@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <harrelson@erols.com>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.60] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8)
  with ESMTP id 1741036 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:30:57 -0400
Received: from 208-59-159-146.s400.tnt2.frdb.va.dialup.rcn.com ([208.59.159.146] helo=OFFICE)
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #7)
	id 17sueH-00054V-00
	for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:30:58 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <053901c261cf$92a69370$cd9f3bd0@OFFICE>
From: "Bill & Sue" <harrelson@erols.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1740993@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel Tank Check Valve LNC2
X-Original-Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 20:32:45 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Good analysis Jim,
I believe that a check valve on a LNC2 is a solution to a non-existant
problem. It's simply not needed.

Bill
harrelson@erols.com
N5ZQ   LNC2   O-320