Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:56:51 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay3.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b4) with ESMTP id 1629802 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:26:46 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay3.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GZCISG05.B0U for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:26:40 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: water landings X-Original-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:25:54 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> Not trying to start a whole new thread here, but one "expert", which I am not, said to land with the gear down - it will slow the plane very fast, minimizing the chance of catching a wingtip and cartwheeling. With the gear up one wing will likely catch a wave and turn the plane at high speed, making for a mess. The idea of just skiing along like a seaplane is apparently not realistic. He said that with the gear down the plane will not pitchpole, but will just stop quickly. I think the few water landings that have been done confirm this. UMMV. Gary Casey C177RG, ES project